![]() |
Dr. Ajay Kumar Upadhyay, Principal Scientist (Soil Science) |
Qualification | |
| |
Specialization / Discipline | |
| |
Positions held | |
Principal Scientist (ICAR):
| |
Area of specialization | |
| |
Current research interest | |
| |
Professional Experience | |
| |
Students guided : | |
| |
Honours and recognition : | |
| |
Deputation Abroad: | |
Presented paper and participated in 120th AOAC International Meeting and Exposition at Minneapolis, USA from 17– 22 September 2006: | |
The Conference was organized by AOAC International and funded by Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA), Ministry of Commerce, New Delhi under National Referral Laboratory Scheme. The paper entitled ‘Multi-residue screening of 100 pesticides in grapes by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry’ was presented in the session of ‘Analysis of Contaminants’ as a poster on 18th September 2006. The paper described the standardized method of sampling, extraction, cleanup and final estimation of 100 pesticides in grape matrix. The validation results including linearity range, limit of detection, limit of quantification, precision and accuracy results were reported for all analytes. Two-dimensional GCxGC separation of co-eluted pesticides was presented. The application of the above method in regular monitoring of pesticide residues in grapes under the residue monitoring program of the APEDA on the samples collected from the vineyards and pack-houses of India were demonstrated. | |
Deputation report for availing Sabbatical Leave (as Hon. Post Doctoral Fellow) from 26th Nov. 2007 to 25th Nov. 2008: | |
The objective of the programme was to study the effect of Advanced fertigation system in comparison to conventional fertigation on nutrient accumulation and leakage from the system in citrus garden. The experiment was laid out in Dareton in New South Wales (Australia). In this study tensiometers and ceramic cup soil water samplers at two different depths below the root zone were used to calculate deep drainage and nitrate leaching for an AF citrus trial site in the Sunraysia Region. The results showed that drainage was 18.5% and 23 kg NO3-N ha-1 was leached for the period between 30th of August 2007 to the 20th of June 2008. This equated to 16% of the nitrogen applied lost as NO3-N leaching. The results showed that the nitrate concentration in the 1.5 m SoluSAMPLER was regularly over the 10 mg/L NO3-N ha-1 threshold. This method of assessing deep drainage and nitrate leaching has been shown to be a viable option for assessing the environmental impacts of AF, due to nitrate leaching and will help in optimizing fertilizer use in citrus production. | |
Part of the Indian delegation to the Netherlands under the framework of Govt. to Govt. project of the Dutch Govt. 10-15, July, 2011 (Netherlands) | |
The Govt. to Govt. interaction was planned with the objective of strengthening good agricultural practices, tracking and tracing system with accompanying sampling for the residue analysis and exchange of best practices in the field of residue analysis. Indian delegation comprised of personnel from CIB&RC, APEDA, State Govt. of Maharashtra and NRC Grapes. The stakeholders in the Netherlands involved in the business of import of agricultural produce from India were sensitized about the mechanisms in place to avoid to the recurrence of CCC like incidences in future. They were briefed about the strategies followed on use of CCC in grapes to minimize its residue and efforts in place to generate relevant data on the basis of which the Indian Govt. will approach EU for revising the MRL, which is at present based on LOQ and not on scientific rationale. They were also informed about the due diligence in place to avoid the recurrence of CCC like incidences in future. The annexure 5 (List of agrochemicals with label claims in India) and annexure 9 (List of agrochemicals to be monitored under RMP) is a dynamic list and is modified based on the requirement. They were also made aware about the competence of the Indian laboratories in the residue testing, through international ring tests involving EU laboratories and participation in FAPAS ring test. It was communicated to them that QS standards being private standard cannot be imposed by the Govt., but the Nominated laboratories can comply with the QS standards. Even the Govt. is not averse to the participation of the EU laboratories in the Grapenet scheme, provided they comply with the rules of the system. The stake holders were also convinced that the scope of analysis need not be extended to 550 chemicals as only 230 chemicals are registered in India. One important aspect agreed upon by them was sharing of the residue monitoring data of the Indian produce for improving the Indian system in future. The recommendations arising out of this visit for increasing the export of grapes from India were submitted to the APEDA (Ministry of Commerce, GOI). | |
Part of the Indian delegation to the UK, Netherlands and Belgium regarding Aflatoxin in peanuts (10-14 June, 2012) | |
Consequent to increased number of rapid alerts against exports of Indian peanuts and the concern expressed through Indian Embassy in Brussels, it was decided to depute a delegation comprising officials from MOC, APEDA, IOPEPC, exporters and the Indian laboratories to EU to visit different ports and laboratories in EU. The objective of the team was to study the aflatoxin contamination in peanut and peanut products on arrival of consignments exported from India to EU countries. Accordingly, a delegation comprising ten officials from IOPEPC, NRL and Nominated laboratories from India visited Felixstowe port, UK, Public Analyst Scientific Services laboratory at Norwich, UK, nVWA office at Zwijndrecht and Warehouse at Rotterdam port, Netherlands and office of the DG-SANCO, Brussels from 10-14th June, 2012. The visit was fruitful as it helped the delegation to understand the various procedures followed at the major port of landing in UK namely, Felixstowe and in The Netherlands, namely, Rotterdam. The differences in the sampling protocol were observed between UK and The Netherlands. The delegation also discussed various trade related issues with the DG-SANCO authorities in Brussels and efforts to streamline them. However, the EU authorities were firm with regard to the issue on greater reduction in rapid alerts as part of confidence building measures. | |
Publications:(Click to access list) |